Alternative
Hacker Bot vs Fluid Attacks
Penetration Testing as a Service with human expertise. How does PTaaS compare to automated developer tooling?
TL;DR
Fluid Attacks offers PTaaS combining automation with human penetration testers—great for organizations wanting managed security services. Hacker Bot is self-serve automated testing built directly into developer workflows.
Choose Fluid Attacks if you want managed PTaaS with human expertise.
Choose Hacker Bot if you want DIY automated testing in your GitHub workflow.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Hacker Bot | Fluid Attacks |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Automated SaaS | PTaaS (Pentest as a Service) |
| Pricing | Transparent, from $59/mo | Custom packages |
| Human Testers | Automated + on-demand | Hybrid with experts |
| Remediation Tracking | GitHub PR workflow | Built-in management |
| Setup Time | Minutes | Engagement-based |
| Continuous Testing | CI/CD integrated | Continuous hacking packages |
| Self-Serve | Yes | No |
| Target Audience | Developers | Security/risk teams |
✓ Where Fluid Attacks Shines
- • Hybrid model: automation + expert human validation
- • Built-in vulnerability management and tracking
- • Continuous hacking packages available
- • Deep expertise and remediation workflows
✗ Where Fluid Attacks Falls Short
- • Higher price points with custom packaging
- • More like traditional PTaaS than dev tooling
- • Not self-serve—sales engagement required
- • Less embedded in developer code workflows
Choose Fluid Attacks If...
- → You want managed PTaaS
- → Human experts are required
- → You prefer outsourced security
- → Full vuln management is needed
Choose Hacker Bot If...
- → You want self-serve tooling
- → Transparent pricing matters
- → GitHub-native is key
- → Developers run security
Security You Control
Run your own security testing without waiting for external engagements.
No credit card required • 7-day Pro trial included